Thanks for your answers Erick & Mohammad!
I'll get back to the list if I have more specific info about this issue, so
far the index is performing normally again.
Best,
Santiago
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hmmm, that is odd, anyone else want to chime in here?
>
> But
Hmmm, that is odd, anyone else want to chime in here?
But optimizing isn't going to help with the strange commit
times, it'll only make it worse. It's not doing you much if
any good, so I'd think about not optimizing
About the commit times in general. Depending upon when the
merge happens, lo
I also have the solr with around 100mn docs.
I do optimize once in a week, and it takes around 1 hour 30 mins to
optimize.
On 19 June 2011 20:02, Santiago Bazerque wrote:
> Hello Erick, thanks for your answer!
>
> Yes, our over-optimization is mainly due to paranoia over these strange
> commit
Hello Erick, thanks for your answer!
Yes, our over-optimization is mainly due to paranoia over these strange
commit times. The long optimize time persisted in all the subsequent
commits, and this is consistent with what we are seeing in other production
indexes that have the same problem. Once the
First, there's absolutely no reason to optimize this often, if at all. Older
versions of Lucene would search faster on an optimized index, but
this is no longer necessary. Optimize will reclaim data from
deleted documents, but is generally recommended to be performed
fairly rarely, often at off-pea
