On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Jérôme Etévé wrote:
> Strange, we've got plenty of memory on this box and the swap is zero.
> But well, I'm happy we went around the problem. What's your experience
> with commits with ~10M docs ( and ~128 autowarming count in caches ) ?
Probably depends somewhat
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Jérôme Etévé wrote:
>> Great,
>>
>> It went down to less than 10 secs now :)
>> What I don't really understand is that my autowarmCount were pretty
>> low ( like 128 ) and still the autowarming of the caches we
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Jérôme Etévé wrote:
> Great,
>
> It went down to less than 10 secs now :)
> What I don't really understand is that my autowarmCount were pretty
> low ( like 128 ) and still the autowarming of the caches were very
> slow.
>
> Can you explain more why it can be that
Great,
It went down to less than 10 secs now :)
What I don't really understand is that my autowarmCount were pretty
low ( like 128 ) and still the autowarming of the caches were very
slow.
Can you explain more why it can be that slow ?
Cheers !
Jerome.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Yonik S
Looks like cache autowarming.
If you have statically defined warming queries in solrconfig.xml, you
could try setting autowarmCount=0 for all the caches.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Jérôme Etévé wrote:
> Dear solr fans,
>
> I have a solr index of roug
