Re: Very bad performance

Hi Yonik. You have really made a great job.=) Here are my benchmark results: With the current class : - 10 users : 860 queries / Average time 0.511 sec - 50 users : 1335 queries / Average time 8.264 sec - 100 users : 1358 queries / Average time 18.703 sec With the

Re: Very bad performance

Great news! I’ll try to test your patch tomorrow. Thanks again, Cédric Yonik Seeley wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Cedric Houis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> You've said that someone will work to improve faceted search. Could you >> tell >> me where I can tract those evol

Re: Very bad performance

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Cedric Houis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've made the test with the latest nightly build of Solr. Performances are > similar. Yep, see http://www.nabble.com/NIO-not-working-yet-to20468152.html#a20468152 > You've said that someone will work to improve faceted sea

Re: Very bad performance

Hi Yonik. I’ve made the test with the latest nightly build of Solr. Performances are similar. You’ve said that someone will work to improve faceted search. Could you tell me where I can tract those evolutions? Thanks in advance, Regards, Cédric Yonik Seeley wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008

Re: Very bad performance

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Cedric Houis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another remark, why do we have better performance when we use parallel > instances of SOLR that use the same index on the same machine? Internal locking. SOLR-465 was committed yesterday... it may improve some things slight

Re: Very bad performance

Hello Yonik. I’ve made few tests more today. Here are the results: Start thread every 0.1->0.5 sec. Each thread waits 2->10 sec before starting a new query Each thread runs 5 min. With FastSolrLRU FullText : - 10 users : 998 queries / Average time 0.037 sec - 50 users : 4819 qu

Re: Very bad performance

Hello Ryantxu. I've check the cache state, it seems that the cache is well used : cumulative_evictions : 0 Thanks for your help, Regards, Cédric ryantxu wrote: > >> >> Data : >> >> 367380 documents >> >> nGeographicLocations : 39298 distincts values >> nPersonNames : 325142 distincts valu

Re: Very bad performance

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your problem is most likely the time it takes to facet on those > multi-valued fields. > Help is coming within the month I'd estimate, in the form of faster > faceting for multivalued fields where the number of values per >

Re: Very bad performance

Your problem is most likely the time it takes to facet on those multi-valued fields. Help is coming within the month I'd estimate, in the form of faster faceting for multivalued fields where the number of values per document is low. Until then, you might be able to get some smaller speedups by try

Re: Very bad performance

Data : 367380 documents nGeographicLocations : 39298 distincts values nPersonNames : 325142 distincts values nOrganizationNames : 130681 distincts values nCategories : 929 distincts values nSimpleConcepts : 110198 distincts values nComplexConcepts : 1508141 distincts values Each of those fields