Re: Using hundreds of dynamic fields

2014-07-16 Thread Jack Krupansky
the fields is a concern as well. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Andy Crossen Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:05 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Using hundreds of dynamic fields Thanks, Jack and Jared, for your input on this. I'm looking into wheth

Re: Using hundreds of dynamic fields

2014-07-16 Thread Andy Crossen
Thanks, Jack and Jared, for your input on this. I'm looking into whether parent-child relationships via block or query time join will meet my requirements. Jack, I noticed in a bunch of other posts around the web that you've suggested to use dynamic fields in moderation. Is this suggestion based

Re: Using hundreds of dynamic fields

2014-06-27 Thread Jared Whiklo
This is probably not the best answer, but my gut says that even if you changed your document to a simple 2 fields and have one as your metric and the other as a TrieDateField you would speed up and simplify your date range queries. -- Jared Whiklo On 2014-06-27 10:10 AM, "Andy Crossen" wrote:

Re: Using hundreds of dynamic fields

2014-06-27 Thread Jack Krupansky
Solr is a "document" oriented database, not a "column" oriented database. Consider making each metric a separate document. Dynamic fields are a powerful feature - if used in moderation, but "hundreds" does not sound like moderation. For example, to add a new metric you have to read and rewrite