Thanks David, I'll play around with it. I appreciate the help,Eric.
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:47:36 -0700
> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Using Solr-3304
>
> When I said "boundary" I meant worldBounds.
>
> Oh
When I said "boundary" I meant worldBounds.
Oh, and set distErrPct="0" to get precise shapes; the default is non-zero.
It'll use more disk space of course, and all the more reason to carefully
choose your world bounds carefully.
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-se
If you can stick to two dimensions then great. Remember to set the boundary
attribute on the field type as I described so that spatial knows the
numerical boundaries that all the data must fit in. e.g. boundary="0 0
10 2.5" (substituting whatever appropriate number of time units you need
for
h the groupId as a whole
part and the ticks as decimals? In other word, GroupId.StartTicks 0 GroupId.EndTicks 2.5.
> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Using Solr-3304
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:07:21 +
>
> Spatial doesn't (yet) su
2012 13:55:24 -0700
>> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Using Solr-3304
>>
>> For your use-case of time ranges, set geo="false" (as you've done). At this
>> point you have a quad tree but it doesn't (yet)
like: 45.634801234 1.5 45.634805667 2.5. I guess I'm
missing something, as I thought that would define a rectangle. Where do the
min max values come into play? > Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:55:24 -0700
> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re
xX=1.7976931348623157E308,minY=-1.7976931348623157E308,maxY=1.7976931348623157E308)"
string
Any ideas?Eric. PS: what does geo=true\false change?
> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:34:07 -0700
> From: [hidden
> email]
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Using Solr-3304
>
> http://wiki.apache.o
7 -0700
> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Using Solr-3304
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrAdaptersForLuceneSpatial4
> Definitely needs some updating; I will try to get to that this weekend.
>
>
>
> -
> Author: h
Thanks David, that's exactly what I needed. One thing, from my experiments,
the order seems to be Xmin Ymin Xmax Ymax for both the indexing and the query.
Eric.> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:34:07 -0700
> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrAdaptersForLuceneSpatial4
Definitely needs some updating; I will try to get to that this weekend.
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-0-Join-
10 matches
Mail list logo
