Thank you all .
Tommaso , Thanks. I will follow the links you suggested.
Erick, It is Solr 1.4.1 ..
Regards,
Rajani Maski
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> Just one more hint, I didn't mention it in the previous email since I
> imagine the scenario you explained doe
Just one more hint, I didn't mention it in the previous email since I
imagine the scenario you explained doesn't allow it but anyways you could
also check Solr Cloud and its distributed requests [1].
Cheers,
Tommaso
[1] : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Distributed_Requests
2011/3/8 Tommaso
Hi Rajani,
i
2011/3/8 rajini maski
>
> Tommaso, Please can you share any link that explains me about how to enable
> and do load balancing on the machines that you did mention above..?
>
>
>
>
if you're querying Solr via SolrJ [1] you could use the LBHttpSolrServer [2]
otherwise, if you still
Have you looked at your cache usage statistics from the admin page? That should
give you some sense of whether your caches are experiencing evictions, which
would also lead to excessive garbage collections. That should give you some
additional information to work with.
Also, what version of Solr a
I have considered the RAM usage points of solr_wiki and yes,I have many
facet queries fired every time and might be this is one of the reason .. I
did give the Xmx-1024m and the error occurred but it was 2-3 times after
many search queries fired.. But then the system slows down . So I needed
any a
Having 2Gb physical memory on the box I would allocate -Xmx1024m to Java as a
starting point.
The other thing you could do is try to trim your config to use less memory. Are
you using many facets? String sorts? Wildcards? Fuzzy? Storing or returning
more fields than needed?
http://wiki.apache.
Hi,
from my experience when you have to scale in the number of documents it's
good idea to use shards (so one schema and N shards containing
(1/N)*total#docs) while if the requirement is granting high query volume
response you could get a significant boost from replicating the same index
on 2 or mo
