On Jan 23, 2008 1:29 PM, Chris Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> And then if you're using
> a client such as solrsharp, there's the question of whether *it* will
> slurp the whole stream into memory.
>
>
Solrsharp reads of the XML stream from Solr use standard dotnet framework
XML objects,
On Jan 23, 2008 4:29 PM, Chris Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Supposing you could do this -- i.e. that you could get Solr to pass a
> particular field's data to Lucene without reading it all into memory
> first --, are there any potential problems on the Lucene end? It's not
> going to turn ar
On Jan 23, 2008 9:04 AM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008 4:10 PM, Owens, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We've got some memory constraint worries from using Java RMI, although I
> > can see this problem could effect the xml requests too. The Java code
> > doesn't s
On Jan 22, 2008 4:10 PM, Owens, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've got some memory constraint worries from using Java RMI, although I can
> see this problem could effect the xml requests too. The Java code doesn't
> seem to handle large files as streams.
It depends on what component we ar
