Re: Updating a single field using Solrj ContentStreamUpdateRequest

2018-02-01 Thread Joris De Smedt
Thanks I think we'll go for extractOnly cause using a recent version of Tika causes to many dependency issues. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Emir Arnautović < emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote: > Hi Joris, > I doubt that you can do that. That would require extracting request > handler to sup

Re: Updating a single field using Solrj ContentStreamUpdateRequest

2018-02-01 Thread Emir Arnautović
Hi Joris, I doubt that you can do that. That would require extracting request handler to support incremental updating and I don’t thing it does. In order to update existing doc, you would have to extract content and send it as incrementa update request. You can still use extracting handler to ex