Hi Otis,
thanks for your input. Although I agree that we may have to go over the
search result once more, I dont think doing so for the first result page
only, is sufficient.
In the first example I showed before, you can see that some of the desired
products (of shops B and C) in fact occur on la
8:15:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Unwanted clustering of search results after sorting by score
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on the problem Max described as well. We did try to omit the
> norms which lead to the phenomenon that products that have a very extensive
> description were mo
Hi,
I'm working on the problem Max described as well. We did try to omit the
norms which lead to the phenomenon that products that have a very extensive
description were more likely to have a higher score since they contained the
word more often. Due to many expands of the SynonymFilter at index-
: Max - field collapsing may be your friend -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
that doesn't really seem related ... i don't believe Max wants to see all
results from a store "collapsed" into on result, i think he wants to see
results from differnet stores treated "more fairly" and
Max - field collapsing may be your friend -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
This field collapsing keeps coming up...
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Max Scheffler
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: F
