Thanks Erick!
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> For future reference, fq clauses are parsed just like the q clause;
> they can be arbitrarily complex.
> Best,
> Erick
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:52 AM, John Blythe wrote:
>> after further investigation it looks like the syn
For future reference, fq clauses are parsed just like the q clause;
they can be arbitrarily complex.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:52 AM, John Blythe wrote:
> after further investigation it looks like the synonym i was testing against
> was only associated with one of their multiple divis
after further investigation it looks like the synonym i was testing against
was only associated with one of their multiple divisions (despite being the
most common name for them!). it looks like this may clear the issue up, but
thanks anyway!
--
*John Blythe*
Product Manager & Lead Developer
251
