is Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: June-03-14 11:41 AM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Strange behaviour when tuning the caches
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Have you seen https://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollapsingQParserPlug
Yes we are already using it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
> Sent: June-03-14 11:41 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange behaviour when tuning the caches
>
> Hi,
>
> Have you seen h
y but we are pretty close of having
> something that performs while being stable.
>
> Thanks all for your help.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: June-03-14 12:17 AM
> > To: solr-user
: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis.gospodne...@gmail.com]
> Sent: June-03-14 12:17 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Strange behaviour when tuning the caches
>
> Hi Jean-Sebastien,
>
> One thing you didn't mention is whether as you are increasing(I assume
Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
> > Sent: June-02-14 10:48 AM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Strange behaviour when tuning the caches
> >
> > On 6/2/2014 8:24 AM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon wrote:
> > > We have yet to determine where t
ct: Re: Strange behaviour when tuning the caches
>
> On 6/2/2014 8:24 AM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon wrote:
> > We have yet to determine where the exact breaking point is.
> >
> > The two patterns we are seeing are:
> >
> > - less cache (around 20-30% hit/rati
On 6/2/2014 8:24 AM, Jean-Sebastien Vachon wrote:
> We have yet to determine where the exact breaking point is.
>
> The two patterns we are seeing are:
>
> - less cache (around 20-30% hit/ratio), poor performance but
> overall good stability
When caches are too small, a low hit ratio is
