]
Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2017 3:13 p.m.
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Stateless queries to secured SOLR server.
On 11/1/2017 4:22 PM, Phil Scadden wrote:
> Except that I am using solrj in an intermediary proxy and passing the
> response directly to a javascript client. It is
On 11/1/2017 4:22 PM, Phil Scadden wrote:
Except that I am using solrj in an intermediary proxy and passing the response
directly to a javascript client. It is expect json or csv depending on what it
passes in wt=
That's a different use case than I had imagined. Thanks for the detail.
My st
: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Stateless queries to secured SOLR server.
On 10/31/2017 2:08 PM, Phil Scadden wrote:
> Thanks Shawn. I have done it with SolrJ. Apart from needing the
> NoopResponseParser to handle the wt=, it was pretty painless.
This is confusing to me, because with
On 10/31/2017 2:08 PM, Phil Scadden wrote:
Thanks Shawn. I have done it with SolrJ. Apart from needing the
NoopResponseParser to handle the wt=, it was pretty painless.
This is confusing to me, because with SolrJ, you do not need to be
concerned with the response format *AT ALL*. You don't n
: Stateless queries to secured SOLR server.
On 10/29/2017 6:13 PM, Phil Scadden wrote:
> While SOLR is behind a firewall, I want to now move to a secured SOLR
> environment. I had been hoping to keep SOLRJ out of the picture and just
> using httpURLConnection. However, I also don't wa
On 10/29/2017 6:13 PM, Phil Scadden wrote:
> While SOLR is behind a firewall, I want to now move to a secured SOLR
> environment. I had been hoping to keep SOLRJ out of the picture and just
> using httpURLConnection. However, I also don't want to maintain session
> state, preferring to send auth
