What William said was the original motivation to sync all slaves to poll
approximately at the same time.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:38 PM, William Bell wrote:
> For our use case this is a no-no. When the index is updated, we need
> all indexes to be updated at the same time.
>
> We put all index
For our use case this is a no-no. When the index is updated, we need
all indexes to be updated at the same time.
We put all indexes (slaves) behind a load balancer and the user would
expect the same results from page to page.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Eric Pugh
wrote:
> I am playing with
