I think the issue is that you are trying to use WordBreakSolrSpellChecker
(which was introduced in Solr 4.x version) in your Solr App of 3.5 version.
You need to correct that.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spelling-suggestions-tp4083519p4083816.html
Sent fr
Actually I don't have much knowledge about the files and configuring
something with solr. Using apache-solr 3.5.0 and requesting the
following URL I got the result as shown in the attachment:
http://localhost:8983/solr/spell?q=delll
ultrashar&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.collate=true&spellcheck.bui
The majority of the behavior outlined in that wiki page should work quite
sufficiently for 3.5.0. Note that there are only a few items that are marked
Solr4.0 only (DirectSolrSpellChecker and WordBreakSolrSpellChecker, for
example).
On Aug 9, 2013, at 6:26 AM, Kamaljeet Kaur wrote:
> Hello,
I'm not sure what you mean. Can you paste in an example spellcheck response
and explain how it differs between the older IndexBasedSpellChecker on 3.1 and
the DirectSolrSpellChecker on 4.0 ?
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: royS
Thanks Robert. Yes thats right I can get some more accuracy if I use
transposition in addition to substitution, insert and deletion.
From: Robert Muir [rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
apply some NLP stuff.
From: Dyer, James [james.d...@ingrambook.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 9:29 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spelling Corrector Algorithm
Yavar,
When you listed what the spell checker returns you put them in
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Husain, Yavar wrote:
> Hi
>
> For spell checking component I set extendedResults to get the frequencies and
> then select the word with the best frequency. I understand the spell check
> algorithm based on Edit Distance. For an example:
>
> Query to Solr: Marien
>
Yavar,
When you listed what the spell checker returns you put them in this order:
> Marine (Freq: 120), Market (Freq: 900) and others
Was "Marine" listed first, and then did you pick "Market" because you thought
higher frequency is better? If so, you probably have the right settings
already b
Ah, didn't tumble to that
Not that I know of. I suspect that the way to handle this would be
to catch the response and inspect it and then fire off a second
query yourself in the middleware layer. That gives you the chance
to form the response page that the user sees and clearly show
that that
I have just been playing around with spell check and from what I can tell it
does not do that automatically, you would need to program that in your
application yourself, basically run a search, check the spellcheck, run the
search again if needed, and present the results to the user, not all tha
Thanks for the Reply Erick. I read through the link you provided as well as
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent but that doesn't seem to be what
I'm looking for. If a user searches for "pell", is there a way to have SOLR
modify the query such
Here's a discussion of the difference between them, does that answer?
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/spell-check-vs-terms-component-td1870214.html
Best
Erick
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:55 AM, TxCSguy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to clear up some confusion about SOLR's spell check
> functi
Thanks, I did a quick testing with collate parameter, It works !!
_
From: Markus Jelsma - Buyways B.V. [mailto:mar...@buyways.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:49 PM
To: cra...@ceiindia.com
Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: spelling suggestion in solr.
Hello,
This is
Thank you for your reply.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Ludwig [mailto:m...@as-guides.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 2:48 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: spelling suggestion in solr.
Radha C. schrieb:
>
> The feature "spelling suggestion" is a
Hello,
This is available indeed, check the
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent wiki page for detailed
information. The interesting parameter here is &spellcheck.collate=true
which will return something like price:[80 TO 100]
dell ultrasharp for the, erronous spelled price:[80 TO 100]
Radha C. schrieb:
The feature "spelling suggestion" is available in solr? If yes, can
you tell me some documentations?
Have you tried googling for: solr spelling ? First hit:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
Michael Ludwig
"solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2009 3:46:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Spelling Component
>
> Shalin, I "think" I did build the spellcheck index, I made the changes
> to solrconfig and schema, restarted, passed a &spellcheck.build=true
> which created
Shalin, I "think" I did build the spellcheck index, I made the changes
to solrconfig and schema, restarted, passed a &spellcheck.build=true
which created the index.
ls -ltr ./spellchecker
-rw-r--r-- 1 XXX users 20 2009-04-03 13:23 segments.gen
-rw-r--r-- 1 XXX users 28 2009-04-03 13:23 segments_f
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Anoop Atre wrote:
> I still don't get any suggestions when I do
> /spellCheckCompRH?q=helultrashar&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.collate=true
>
>
Did you build the spellcheck index? Try specifying a correct word which you
know is in the index. See if spellchecker ret
Otis, Thanks for getting back...I did have to restart for the
schema/config changes to take effect which I'd guessed. : )
I am using the SpellCheckComponent and following the directions on the
wiki. It says to do a set it up using the component AND the RequestHandler.
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr
Hi,
The $SOLR_URL/solr/biblio/ looks suspicious. Should that be $SOLR_URL/solr/ ?
Also note that you are using the old SpellCheck RequestHandler, and we not have
a SpellCheckComponent - http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr -
Any opinions on commenting out the stemmer in the default text field?
It might be less confusing to have a more intuitive example, while
easily showing the way to the more advanced analysis.
I'm in favor of that. I imagine there's others like me that want to get
started with the defaults fir
On 2/8/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could fix this specific case with either configuring protected
words on the stemmer, or by using the synonym filter and mapping one
of the alternatives to something that won't be stemmed (but the former
is probably a better option).
More ge
Adding to Mike's comments, for this specific query, one can see that
both words stem to "illeg":
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=illegible+illegal&debugQuery=on
You could fix this specific case with either configuring protected
words on the stemmer, or by using the synonym filter and mapping
On 2/8/07, Michael Kimsal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Solr friends:
Mr. Klaas - I've not tested your patch yet (will try to get to it soon) but
I've found almost the opposite problem now and people are questioning
how/why things are happening as they are.
I'm searching for the word "illega
Hello Solr friends:
Mr. Klaas - I've not tested your patch yet (will try to get to it soon) but
I've found almost the opposite problem now and people are questioning
how/why things are happening as they are.
I'm searching for the word "illegal" and the query results are coming back
with an entry
On 2/6/07, Michael Kimsal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When you say rewrite the query, what specifically do you mean? I'm googling
(direct and on the solr site)
for query.rewrite, but nothing is jumping out at me as anything that's
useful/pertinent. It sounds like
you're telling me to do some ma
This isn't something I use that approach on. Let me explain.
I work in a call center, and I'm doing a search for specific key word in
customer notes every night.
For example, we might need a report of which customers called up about
"apple", "banana" or "pear".
I have a script which generates a
Doesn't the built-in Solr Highlighting feature do the rewrite? If
not, it should. I looked into this once and I believe it does have
this particular bug, but I also vaguely recall it not being
straightforward to rewrite the query at that point in the code.
Erik
On Feb 6, 2007, a
6 feb 2007 kl. 04.19 skrev Michael Kimsal:
Thanks Erik. That worked, then threw me for another loop, which I
sort of
have fixed I think.
I'm using the highligher functionality, but it doesn't seem to
highlight the
'matched' word if it's a partial match, although it does in fact
return t
Thanks Erik. That worked, then threw me for another loop, which I sort of
have fixed I think.
I'm using the highligher functionality, but it doesn't seem to highlight the
'matched' word if it's a partial match, although it does in fact return that
record. Am I missing something obvious here, or
On Feb 5, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Michael Kimsal wrote:
I've looked through the archives but don't see any specific issue
relating
to my question.
Is there a way to have SOLR return partial matches - words that are
one (or
two or X) letters off the matching word? A search for 'field'
would als
32 matches
Mail list logo
