On Mar 11, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>>
>
> I've just locate a previous message on this list from Mark Miller saying that
> in Solr 4, commitWithin is a soft commit.
Yes, that's true.
>
> You should definitely wait for Mark or another committer to verify what I'm
> saying in t
On Mar 11, 2013, at 5:52 PM, jimtronic wrote:
> Should I omit commitWithin and set DIH to commit=false and just let soft and
> autocommit do their jobs?
Yeah, that's one valid option. You def are not able to keep up with the current
commit / open searcher level. It looks like DIH will do a har
On 3/11/2013 3:52 PM, jimtronic wrote:
The load test was fairly heavy (ie lots of users) and designed to mimic a
fully operational system with lots of users doing normal things.
There were two things I gleaned from the logs:
PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2 appeared for severa
The load test was fairly heavy (ie lots of users) and designed to mimic a
fully operational system with lots of users doing normal things.
There were two things I gleaned from the logs:
PERFORMANCE WARNING: Overlapping onDeckSearchers=2 appeared for several of
my more active cores
and
The non-l
There is an open JIRA issue about trying to "spread the leader load" during
elections. Was waiting to get reports that it was really a problem for someone
though.
How much load were you putting on? How long were the nodes unresponsive?
Unresponsive to everything? Just updates? Searches? What ve
