Re: SolrJ XML indexing

2009-03-11 Thread Ashish P
Yes cleaning up works... But not sure how to avoid this happening again?? -Ashish jonbaer wrote: > > Id suggest what someone else mentioned to just do a full clean up of > the index. Sounds like you might have kill -9 or stopped the process > manually while indexing (would be only reason f

Re: SolrJ XML indexing

2009-03-11 Thread Jon Baer
Id suggest what someone else mentioned to just do a full clean up of the index. Sounds like you might have kill -9 or stopped the process manually while indexing (would be only reason for a left over lock). - Jon On Mar 11, 2009, at 5:16 AM, Ashish P wrote: I added single in indexDefault

Re: SolrJ XML indexing

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Erm... can it be you have several processes running on it? I would start by a cleanup of it all and attempt a simple solr addition before the xml. paul Le 11-mars-09 à 10:16, Ashish P a écrit : I added single in indexDefaults that made the error before go away but now I am getting foll

Re: SolrJ XML indexing

2009-03-11 Thread Ashish P
I added single in indexDefaults that made the error before go away but now I am getting following error : Mar 11, 2009 6:12:56 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SEVERE: java.io.IOException: Cannot overwrite: C:\dw-solr\solr\data\index\_1o.fdt at org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirect

Re: SolrJ XML indexing

2009-03-11 Thread Ashish P
Thanks man. I just tried what u suggested but I am getting following error when performing request Mar 11, 2009 6:00:28 PM org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter getDirectory WARNING: No lockType configured for C:\dw-solr\solr\./data/index/ assuming 'simple' Mar 11, 2009 6:00:29 PM org.apache.sol

Re: SolrJ XML indexing

2009-03-11 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
String xml = null;//load the file to the xml string DirectXmlRequest up = new DirectXmlRequest( "/update", xml ); solrServer.request( up ); On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Ashish P wrote: > > I have an XML file with structure : > >   ... >   ... >   . >   . > > > It is present on disk on some