Re: SolrCloud - distributed architecture considerations

2012-10-14 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 10/14/2012 11:16 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: No, that's not what I'm thinking at all. There would be _no_ replication configured. You'd just have two completely independent installations, one in each of your separate locations. The only communication path would be that somehow the original docum

Re: SolrCloud - distributed architecture considerations

2012-10-14 Thread Erick Erickson
No, that's not what I'm thinking at all. There would be _no_ replication configured. You'd just have two completely independent installations, one in each of your separate locations. The only communication path would be that somehow the original documents would need to get to both locations for ind

Re: SolrCloud - distributed architecture considerations

2012-10-14 Thread AlexeyK
In other words, I would have to apply a mixture of modes: SolrCloud for each location + old-style replication for mirroring. BTW, I've seen a notion of 'role' in node cloud state. Is it in use or is there for future extensions? Having 'indexer' and 'searcher' roles backed by the infrastructure wou

Re: SolrCloud - distributed architecture considerations

2012-10-14 Thread Erick Erickson
First, remember that SolrCloud is relatively new, operational issues like this will doubtless accrue "folk wisdom" as we all gain experience... But my current thinking is that the remote installations are essentially completely separate installations with no knowledge of each other. Your indexing