thanks for replying currently my machine specs are
32 GB RAM
4 core processor
windows server 2008 64bit
500 GB HD
16 GB swap memorey
now the already running machine with cpu usage not more than 10% already
consumed all the RAM and now started to use swap memorey what my guess is
my server will cho
hello dear thanks for replying it means 3 ZK instances are more than enough
in my case
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Here's a longer form of Toke's answer:
>
> https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/07/23/sizing-hardware-in-the-abstract-why-we-dont-have-a-definitive-answer/
bq: Well, a good reason would be if you want your system to
continue to operate if 2 ZK nodes lose communication with
the rest of the cluster or go down completely
My argument is usually that if you are losing 2 of 3 ZK nodes
at the same time with any regularity, you probably have
problems that wo
bq. There's no good reason to have 5 with a small cluster and by "small" I
mean < 100s of nodes.
Well, a good reason would be if you want your system to continue to operate
if 2 ZK nodes lose communication with the rest of the cluster or go down
completely. Just to be clear though, the ZK nodes de
Here's a longer form of Toke's answer:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/07/23/sizing-hardware-in-the-abstract-why-we-dont-have-a-definitive-answer/
BTW, on the surface, having 5 ZK nodes isn't doing you any real good.
Zookeeper isn't really involved in serving queries or handling
updates, it's pur
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 10:55 +0500, Zap Org wrote:
> i wanted to ask that i need to index after evey 15 min with hard commit
> (real time records) and currently have 5 zookeeper instances and 2 solr
> instances in one machine serving 200 users with 32GB RAM. whereas i wanted
> to serve more than 10,
