>
> Just another resurrected Neozoic Archosaur comics.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mojosaurus/sets/72157600257724083/
>
>
>
> From: Upayavira
> >To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2011 4:42 AM
>
oint it
>> out.
>>
>> On a related note, is there a way to 'automagically' split the existing
>> index into multiple shards?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Ishwar
>>
>>
>> Just another resurrected Neozoic Archosaur comics.
>> http:/
other resurrected Neozoic Archosaur comics.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mojosaurus/sets/72157600257724083/
>
>
> From: Upayavira
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2011 7:17 PM
> Subject: Re: Solr n00b question: writing a custom QueryCompone
Hi,
i agree with Upayavira, probably it's better to create an external app that
retrieves content from a db.
Anyway, if i am not wrong,
finishStage is a method called by the coordinator if you have a distributed
search.
if your solr is on a single machine every component should implement only
pre
://www.flickr.com/photos/mojosaurus/sets/72157600257724083/
From: Upayavira
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2011 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: Solr n00b question: writing a custom QueryComponent
The conventional way to do it would be to index your title and content
fields in Solr, al
functionality in solr itself.
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Ishwar
>
>
> Just another resurrected Neozoic Archosaur comics.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mojosaurus/sets/72157600257724083/
>
>
> From: Upayavira
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent
11 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: Solr n00b question: writing a custom QueryComponent
I'm still not quite clear what you are attempting to achieve, and more
so why you need to extend Solr rather than just wrap it.
You have data with title, description and content fields. You make no
mention of an ID fie
I'm still not quite clear what you are attempting to achieve, and more
so why you need to extend Solr rather than just wrap it.
You have data with title, description and content fields. You make no
mention of an ID field.
Surely, if you want to store some in mysql and some in Solr, you could
make
