Thanks a lot for your responses! They were all very helpful!
On Nov 20, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:26:27 -0600
Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting, this ALL MASTERS mode... I guess you don't do any
replication then...
correct
In t
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:26:27 -0600
Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting, this ALL MASTERS mode... I guess you don't do any
> replication then...
correct
> In the single master, several slaves mode, I'm assuming the client
> still writes to one and reads from the others.
Thanks for the response!
Interesting, this ALL MASTERS mode... I guess you don't do any
replication then...
In the single master, several slaves mode, I'm assuming the client
still writes to one and reads from the others... right?
On Nov 20, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Matthew Runo wrote:
Yes. T
/SolrCollectionDistributionOperationsOutline
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CollectionRebuilding
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrAdminGUI
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Runo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 10:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr cluster topology.
Yes. The
Yes. The clients will always be a minute or two behind the master.
I like the way some people are doing it - make them all masters! Just
post your updates to each of them - you loose a bit of performance
perhaps, but it doesn't matter if a server bombs out or you have to
upgrade them, since
