i used to think cache data with memcached.
why i think that?
for example, i have 45 solr instance, and i have to merge their results into
on array and sort by score or datetime, if i use rows=10, it means i will
get max 45*10 results,,but it only show 10result per page.
how to do with 440 resul
: 2. Can anyone think of any reasons why this might not be a good idea? (I
: *just* started considering this)
: 3. I read http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching , but I think the
: whole cache discarding and warming wouldn't be needed if what I store in
: memcached is: StringRepresentationOfQuer
Hi Otis,
I'm considering adding support for caching results in memcached. Questions:
1. Has anyone already done this? (searched, didn't find anything)
Not exactly, but we do something similar to this for Nutch searches
using ehcache (http://krugle.com/kse/projects/eFNJEmX). But we store
th
If you store internal docids, then you need to add the specific reader
(or index version?) as part of the key since the ids are transient.
-Yonik
On 4/27/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering adding support for caching results in memcached. Questions:
1. Has any
