Thanks Erick & Ahmet, that helps.
> Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:25:11 -0400
> Subject: Re: Solr Terms and Date field issues
> From: erickerick...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> OK, I'm reaching a little here, but I think it's got a pretty good ch
some test data (test.xml).
>
> Thanks for looking this.
> Viswa
>
>
>> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:08:31 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Solr Terms and Date field issues
>> From: erickerick...@gmail.com
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> H, this i
(test.xml).
Thanks for looking this.
Viswa
> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:08:31 -0400
> Subject: Re: Solr Terms and Date field issues
> From: erickerick...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> H, this is puzzling. If you could come up with a couple of xml
> file
Please find attached the schema and some test data (test.xml).
Thanks for looking this.
Viswa
> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 19:08:31 -0400
> Subject: Re: Solr Terms and Date field issues
> From: erickerick...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> H, this is puzzling.
rue) and then
> a optimize. All other fields show updated terms except the date fields. I
> have also double checked to see if the Luke handler has any different terms,
> and it did not.
>
>
> Thanks
> Viswa
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 08:17:39 -0400
>>
; Subject: Re: Solr Terms and Date field issues
> From: erickerick...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Hmmm, this *looks* like you've changed your schema without
> re-indexing all your data so you're getting old (string?) values in
> that field, but that&#
Hmmm, this *looks* like you've changed your schema without
re-indexing all your data so you're getting old (string?) values in
that field, but that's just a guess. If this is really happening on a
clean index it's a problem.
I'm also going to guess that you're not really deleting the documents
you
