Yes, approach #2 will certainly be useful. I'll open an issue.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Hmm, I don't think there is currently a solution for this. #1 is not
> viable for the reasons you mentioned and #2 is not supported by the current
> code. That being said, I
Hmm, I don't think there is currently a solution for this. #1 is not
viable for the reasons you mentioned and #2 is not supported by the
current code. That being said, I think it wouldn't be too hard to for
someone to work up a patch for this. Essentially, we need the ability
to add in p
