Thanks for the reply.
The overhead you describe is what I suspected, I was just suprised that if
DSE is able to keep that overhead small enough that the overall result is
faster with the extra hardware, Solr doesn't also benefit.
I did try with RF=2 and shards=1, and yep, it's way fast. Really ni
Brent wrote:
> I've been testing Solr Cloud 6.1.0 with two servers, and getting somewhat
> disappointing query latency. I'm comparing the latency with the same tests,
> running DSE in place of Solr Cloud. It's surprising, because running the
> test just on my laptop (running a single instance of S
