RE: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave

2014-03-04 Thread Geary, Frank
- From: Geary, Frank Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 12:10 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave Thanks Greg. We optimize the master once a week (early in the day Sunday) and we do not do a commit Sunday evening (the only evening of the week wh

RE: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave

2014-03-03 Thread Geary, Frank
o: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave I just ran into an issue similar to this that effected document scores on distributed searches. You might try doing an optimize and purging your deleted documents while no indexing is being done the

RE: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave

2014-03-03 Thread Geary, Frank
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave That really shouldn't be happening IF indexing is shut off. Otherwise the slave is taking a snapshot of the master index and synching. bq: The slave has about 33 more documents and one fewer se

Re: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave

2014-03-03 Thread Greg Walters
I just ran into an issue similar to this that effected document scores on distributed searches. You might try doing an optimize and purging your deleted documents while no indexing is being done then checking your counts. Once I optimized all my indexes the document counts on all of my cores mat

Re: Solr 4.5.0 replication numDocs larger in slave

2014-02-28 Thread Erick Erickson
That really shouldn't be happening IF indexing is shut off. Otherwise the slave is taking a snapshot of the master index and synching. bq: The slave has about 33 more documents and one fewer segements (according to Overview in solr admin Sounds like the master is still indexing and you've deleted