Re: Solr 3.1 performance compared to 1.4.1

2011-04-12 Thread Marius van Zwijndregt
Hi Lance, Well not actually copied over the whole configuration files, instead i just added in the missing configuration (into a fresh copy of the example directory). By the directory implementation do you mean the readers used by SolrIndexSearcher ? These are: reader : SolrIndexReader{this=1cb0

Re: Solr 3.1 performance compared to 1.4.1

2011-04-11 Thread Lance Norskog
Marius: "I have copied the configuration from 1.4.1 to the 3.1." Does the Directory implementation show up in the JMX beans? In admin/statistics.jsp ? Or the Solr startup logs? (Sorry, don't have a Solr available.) Yonik: > What platform are you on? I believe the Lucene Directory > implementatio

Re: Solr 3.1 performance compared to 1.4.1

2011-04-11 Thread Marius van Zwijndregt
Hi Yonik ! Thanks for your reply. I decided to switch to 3.1 and see if the performance would settle down after building up a proper index. Looking at the average response time from both installations i can see that 3.1 is now actually performing much better than 1.4.1 (1.4.1 shows an average of

Re: Solr 3.1 performance compared to 1.4.1

2011-04-10 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Marius van Zwijndregt wrote: > Hello ! > > I'm new to the list, have been using SOLR for roughly 6 months and love it. > > Currently i'm setting up a 3.1 installation, next to a 1.4.1 installation > (Ubuntu server, same JVM params). I have copied the configuration f