Hi Markus,
SPDY does provide lower latency in the case when I have multiple requests to
the same server/domain. It compresses the header and reduces the number of
connections. But since it uses tls I am not sure if it will be faster than http
1.1. That is why I wanted to test SPDY with solr for
Hi Harsh,
Does SPDY provide lower latency than HTTP/1.1 with KeepAlive or is it
encryption that you're after?
Markus
-Original message-
From:harspras
Sent:Tue 13-05-2014 05:38
Subject:Re: Solr + SPDY
To:solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Hi Vinay,
I have been trying to setup a simil
Hi Vinay,
I have been trying to setup a similar environment with SPDY being enabled
for Solr inter shard communication. Did you happen to have been able to do
it? I somehow cannot use SolrCloud with SPDY enabled in jetty.
Regards,
Harsh Prasad
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.47
Hi Otis,
While the main goal of SPDY is to reduce page load times - i think we could
benefit from it in Solr context as well.
The transport layer is still TCP - but SPDY allows multiplexing of
requests. It also uses compression and reduces the overhead of http
headers.
An excerpt from http://webt
I'm rusty on SPDY. Can you summarize the benefits in Solr context? Thanks.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Oct 25, 2013 10:46 AM, "Vinay Pothnis" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Couple of questions related to using SPDY with solr.
>
> 1. Does anybody have experience running Solr o
