t: Re: Solr, SQL Server's LIKE
On 12/29/2011 3:51 PM, Devon Baumgarten wrote:
> N-Grams get me pretty great results in general, but I don't want the results
> for this particular search to be fuzzy. How can I prevent the fuzzy matches
> from appearing?
>
> Ex: If I search
On 12/29/2011 3:51 PM, Devon Baumgarten wrote:
N-Grams get me pretty great results in general, but I don't want the results
for this particular search to be fuzzy. How can I prevent the fuzzy matches
from appearing?
Ex: If I search "Albatross" I want "Albert" to be excluded completely, rather
Thanks, Erick! That sounds great. I really do have to upgrade.
Chantal
On Sun, 2012-01-01 at 16:42 +0100, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Chantal:
>
> bq: The problem with the wildcard searches is that the input is not
> analyzed.
>
> As of 3.6/4.0, this is no longer entirely true. Some analysis is
>
;
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 7:00 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Solr, SQL Server's LIKE
>
>
> : Thanks. I know I'll be able to utilize some of Solr
me realize that the n-grams are the source of all my current
problems. :)
Thanks!
Devon Baumgarten
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 7:00 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr, SQL Server's LIKE
The problem with the wildcard searches is that the input is not
analyzed. For english, this might not be such a problem (except if you
expect case insenstive search). But than again, you don't get that with
like, either. Ngrams bring that and more.
What I think is often forgotten when comparing '
: Thanks. I know I'll be able to utilize some of Solr's free text
: searching capabilities in other search types in this project. The
: product manager wants this particular search to exactly mimic LIKE%.
...
: Ex: If I search "Albatross" I want "Albert" to be excluded completely,
: rat
Hi Devon,
Have you considered using a permuterm index? Its workable, but depending
on your requirements (size of fields that you want to create the index
on), it may bloat your index. I've written about it here:
http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2011/10/lucene-wildcard-query-and-permuterm.html
Anothe
ilto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:44 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr, SQL Server's LIKE
SQLs "like" is usually handled with ngrams if you want
*stuff* kinds of searches. Wildcards are "interesting"
in Solr.
Things Sol
SQLs "like" is usually handled with ngrams if you want
*stuff* kinds of searches. Wildcards are "interesting"
in Solr.
Things Solr handles that aren't easy in SQL
Phrases, phrases with slop, stemming,
synonyms. And, especially, some kind
of relevance ranking.
But Solr does NOT do the things SQL i
for a simple, hackish (albeit inefficient) approach look up wildcard searchers
e,g foo*, *bar
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Devon Baumgarten
wrote:
> I have been tinkering with Solr for a few weeks, and I am convinced that it
> could be very helpful in many of my upcoming projects. I am t
11 matches
Mail list logo
