yes it is possible
http://www.medihack.org/2011/03/01/autocompletion-autosuggestion-using-solr/
Since i m looking into autosuggest i came across that info while doing
research..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-terms-performance-problem-tp3351352p
d...
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message -
> From: roySolr
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 3:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Slow autocomple
Thanks for helping me so far,
Yes i have seen the edgeNGrams possiblity. Correct me if i'm wrong, but i
thought it isn't possible to do infix searches with edgeNGrams? Like "chest"
gives suggestion "manchester".
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-t
/
- Original Message -
> From: roySolr
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Slow autocomplete(terms)
>
> Hello Erick,
>
> Thanks for your answer but i have some problems with the ngramfilter.
not sure if u already seen this but may be useful
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-terms-performance-problem-tp3351352p3360663.html
Sent from the S
Hello Erick,
Thanks for your answer but i have some problems with the ngramfilter.
My conf look like this:
I see this in the analysis:
"manchester"
ma an nc ch he es st t
Think about ngrams if you really need infix searches,
you're right that the regex is very probably the
root of your problem. The index has to examine
*every* term in the field to determine if the regex
will match.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:57 AM, roySolr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I used th
