RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-18 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:16 PM > To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org' > Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter > > Andy, > > OK, I get what you're doing. As far as a

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-18 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
ur query (or, at least, terms > matching exact words or the beginning of phrases in your query) is > extremely high . Perhaps that's coming from this "partial word match" > you > mention -- how does that work? > > -- Bryan > > > My guess is that this has som

Re: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-17 Thread Floyd Wu
. > >> Again, I'm using the FastVectorHighlighting. The hl.fl is set to "name > >> name_par description description_par content content_par" so that it > >> returns highlights for full and partial word matches. All of those > >> fields have indexed,

Re: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-15 Thread Michael McCandless
hraseList.addIfNoOverlap( >>> >>> ) >> >> That is a strange and interesting set of things to be spending most of >> your CPU time on. The implication, I think, is that the number of term >> matches in the document for terms in your query

Re: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-15 Thread Michael Sokolov
set to "true". It all seems redundant just to allow for partial word matching/highlighting but I didn't know of a better way. Does anything stand out to you that could be the culprit? Let me know if you need any more clarification. Thanks! - Andy -Original Message--

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-06-14 Thread Andy Brown
set to "true". It all seems redundant just to allow for partial word matching/highlighting but I didn't know of a better way. Does anything stand out to you that could be the culprit? Let me know if you need any more clarification. Thanks! - Andy -Original Message

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-05-29 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
.com] > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:39 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using > FastVectorHighlighter > > My guess is that the problem is those 200M documents. > FastVectorHighlighter is fast at deciding whether a match, especia

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-05-22 Thread Andy Brown
che.org Subject: RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter My guess is that the problem is those 200M documents. FastVectorHighlighter is fast at deciding whether a match, especially a phrase, appears in a document, but it still starts out by walking the entire list of term vect

RE: Slow Highlighter Performance Even Using FastVectorHighlighter

2013-05-20 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
My guess is that the problem is those 200M documents. FastVectorHighlighter is fast at deciding whether a match, especially a phrase, appears in a document, but it still starts out by walking the entire list of term vectors, and ends by breaking the document into candidate-snippet fragments, both p