Thanks
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> It all depends. I mean, if you have 20 million URLs averaging 40
> characters each, that's 80 MB, not a big deal at all, but if you have 20
> billion URLs that would take up 80 GB, which might be a big deal. But if
> you shard those
It all depends. I mean, if you have 20 million URLs averaging 40 characters
each, that's 80 MB, not a big deal at all, but if you have 20 billion URLs
that would take up 80 GB, which might be a big deal. But if you shard those
20 billion documents into 10 shards, 8 GB may or may not be a big dea
Using arbitrary strings affects at least on the traffic between the
shard(s) and a querying client or shards and a frontend solr instance. We
have actually hit such an issue, described here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4903, which has triggered the
suggestion for ids compaction:
http
