Hi Dave,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:03 PM, dmarini wrote:
> Roman,
>
> As a developer, I understand where you are coming from. My issue is that I
> specialize in .NET, haven't done java dev in over 10 years. As an
> organization we're new to solr (coming from endeca) and we're looking to
> use
e a quoted phrase.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: dmarini
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 2:03 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching w/explicit Multi-Word Synonym Expansion
Roman,
As a developer, I understand where you are coming from. My issue is that I
Roman,
As a developer, I understand where you are coming from. My issue is that I
specialize in .NET, haven't done java dev in over 10 years. As an
organization we're new to solr (coming from endeca) and we're looking to use
it more across the organization, so for us, we are looking to do the clas
e.org
Subject: Re: Searching w/explicit Multi-Word Synonym Expansion
As I don't see in the heads of the users, I can make different assumptions
- but OK, seems reasonable that only minority of users here are actually
willing to do more (btw, I've received coding advice in the past here in
t
rch for query-time phrase
> synonyms, off-the-shelf, today, no patches required.)
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Roman Chyla
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:44 AM
>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Searching w/expli
(And, in fact, users can use LucidWorks Search for query-time phrase
synonyms, off-the-shelf, today, no patches required.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Roman Chyla
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 11:44 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching w/explicit Multi-Wor
ing made, but we're not there yet.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Roman Chyla
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:58 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Subject: Re: Searching w/explicit Multi-Word Synonym Expansion
>
> Hi all,
>
>
---Original Message-
From: Roman Chyla
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:58 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching w/explicit Multi-Word Synonym Expansion
Hi all,
What I find very 'sad' is that Lucene/SOLR contain all the necessary
components for handling multi-to
Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: dmarini
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 9:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Searching w/explicit Multi-Word Synonym Expansion
iorixxx,
Thanks for pointing me in the direction of the QueryElevation component. If
it did not require tha
Hi all,
What I find very 'sad' is that Lucene/SOLR contain all the necessary
components for handling multi-token synonyms; the Finite State Automaton
works perfectly for matching these items; the biggest problem is IMO the
old query parser which split things on spaces and doesn't know to be
smarte
iorixxx,
Thanks for pointing me in the direction of the QueryElevation component. If
it did not require that the target documents be keyed by the unique key
field it would be ideal, but since our Sku field is not the Unique field (we
have an internal id which serves as the key while this is the cl
Hi Dmarin,
Did you consider using http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent ?
From: Jack Krupansky
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:53 AM
Subject: Re: Searching w/explicit Multi-Word Synonym Expansion
In case
In case you were unaware, generalized multi-word synonym expansion is an
unsolved problem in Lucene/Solr. Sure, some of the tools are there and you
can sometimes make it work for some situations, but not for the general
case. Some work has been in progress, but no near-term solution is at hand.
13 matches
Mail list logo
