There is not nearly enough information here to begin
to help you.
At minimum we need:
1> your field definition
2> the text you index
3> the query you send
You might want to review:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best,
Erick
> On Nov 3, 2020, at 1:08 AM, Viresh Sasalawad
> wro
While indexing @ is removed. You need to use your own Tokenizer which will
consider "@rohit" as one word.
Another option is to break the tweet in to two fields, @ and the
tweet. Index both the fields but don't use any tokenizer for the field "
@". Just index as it is. While querying you need to se
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Did you reindex all your data and commit it afterward?
>
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Devin Austin
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM,
Did you reindex all your data and commit it afterward?
Erick
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Devin Austin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson >wrote:
> >
> >> I think the root of your problem is the strin
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Devin Austin wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>
>> I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default
>> field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed
>> "my name is erick", the *only* thing that would mat
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default
> field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed
> "my name is erick", the *only* thing that would match
> is searching for exactly that. Searching for "erick" wouldn't
I think the root of your problem is the string type of your default
field. That type is untokenized, so if you indexed
"my name is erick", the *only* thing that would match
is searching for exactly that. Searching for "erick" wouldn't
match, nor anything besides the exact and entire value
I su
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> At a guess, you're looking in the default field for the letter "i", which
> has probably been removed at indexing time because it is a
> stopword. Unless you specify a field (e.g. q=field:value), the search
> goes against your default field (
At a guess, you're looking in the default field for the letter "i", which
has probably been removed at indexing time because it is a
stopword. Unless you specify a field (e.g. q=field:value), the search
goes against your default field (specified in schema).
Two very useful tools are :
the solr adm
