@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: SOLR 4.8.0 Master/Slave Replication Issues
Valid point on the soft commits. I'll try disabling them to see if there if
any change in performance as well. Worth a shot ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
l Message-----
> From: Andrea Gazzarini [mailto:gxs...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:12 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR 4.8.0 Master/Slave Replication Issues
>
> Hi Scott,
> that could depend on a lot of things. Some questions:
>
>
. Hoping this might be our issue ;-) I'll report back in a
> bit though!
>
> Thanks for the reminder about commits. We may have forgotten to change these
> values when these new servers got setup.
>
> Scott
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Gazzarini [
se
values when these new servers got setup.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Gazzarini [mailto:gxs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 3:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR 4.8.0 Master/Slave Replication Issues
Hi Scott,
that could depend on a lot
Hi Scott,
that could depend on a lot of things. Some questions:
* What is your commit policy? Explicit / auto / soft / hard ...
* "Other days things are off by a small amount between master and
slave"...what do you mean exactly? What is the behaviour you see in
terms of index versions bet