: i.e. just extend facet.sort to allow a 'count desc'. By convention, ok
: to use a a space in the name? - or would count.desc (and count.asc as
: alias for count) be more compliant?
i would use space to remain consistent with the existing "sort"
param.
it might even make sense to refactor (
>
> now i'm totally confused: what are you suggesting this new param would
> do, what does the name mean?
>
Sorry, I wan't clear - there isn't a new parameter, except the one added in the
patch. What I was suggesting here is to do the work
to remove the new parameter I just put in (facet.sorto
: working well. The only caveat to this is that the reverse sort results
: don't include 0-count facets (see notes in SOLR-1672), so reverse sort
...
: believe patching to include 0 counts could open a can of worms in terms
: of b/w compat and performance, as 0 counts look to be skipped
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:18:33 -0800
> From: hossman_luc...@fucit.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Reverse sort facet query [SOLR-1672]
>
>
> : Yes, I thought about adding some 'new syntax', but I opted for a separate
> 'face
: Yes, I thought about adding some 'new syntax', but I opted for a separate
'facet.sortorder' parameter,
:
: mainly because I'm not familiar enough with the codebase to know what effect
this might have on
:
: backward compatibility. It would be easy enough to modify the patch I created
to do
s way.
[see SOLR-1672]
Thanks,
Peter
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:24:25 -0800
> From: hossman_luc...@fucit.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Reverse sort facet query
>
>
> : I'll have a look at SimpleFacets.java to look at patching it. I shou
: I'll have a look at SimpleFacets.java to look at patching it. I should
: think the sorting bit will be relatively straightforward. The tricky bit
: is how to submit the request via the query interface - there's only a
: boolean
in Solr 1.4 the boolean syntax was deprecated in place of keywor
, 15 Dec 2009 13:12:44 -0800
> From: hossman_luc...@fucit.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Reverse sort facet query
>
>
> : Does anyone know of a good way to perform a reverse-sorted facet query
> (i.e. rarest first)?
>
> I'm fairly confident that cod
: Does anyone know of a good way to perform a reverse-sorted facet query (i.e.
rarest first)?
I'm fairly confident that code doesn't exist at the moment.
If i remember correctly, it would be fairly simply to implement if you'd
like to submit a patch: when sorting by count a simple bounded p
