r - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: kenf_nc
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, April 13, 2011 4:49:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Result order when score is the same
>
> Is a new DocID generated everytime
all documents. But, I would want the sort to be at the system level, I dont'
want the overhead of sorting every query I ever make.
How would 'doing it at the system level' avoid the 'overhead of sorting
every query'? Every query has to be sorted, if you want it sorted.
Beyond setting a def
> Is a new DocID generated everytime a doc with the same UniqueID is added to
> the index? If so, then docID must be incremental and would look like
> indexed_at ascending. What I see (and why it's a problem for me) is the
> following.
Yes, Solr removes the old and inserts a new when updating an
Is a new DocID generated everytime a doc with the same UniqueID is added to
the index? If so, then docID must be incremental and would look like
indexed_at ascending. What I see (and why it's a problem for me) is the
following.
a search brings back the first 5 documents in a result set of say 60.
Sorting a large set is costly, the more fields you sort on, the more memory is
consumed (and likely cached).
If i remember correctly the result set will be ordered according to Lucene
DocID's if there's nothing to sort on.
If i read correctly, you don't want to specify those fixed sort paramete
If you omitNorms and omitTermFreqAndPositions on the query field(s) and use no
funky boost functions, all results will have identical score in AND-queries
(or queries with one search term). IDF has no meaning because of AND,
queryNorm is the same across the resultset, fieldNorm is 1 and TF is 1.
Au contraire, I have almost 4 million documents, representing businesses in
the US. And having the score be the same is a very common occurrence.
It is quite clear from testing that if score is the same, then it sorts on
indexed_at ascending. It seems silly to make me add a sort on every query,
th
In real life though, it seems unlikely that the relevancy score will
ever be identical, so the second sort field will never be used. Is
relevancy score ever identical? Rarely at any rate.
On 4/13/2011 3:22 PM, Rob Casson wrote:
you could just explicitly send multiple sorts...from the tutoria
you could just explicitly send multiple sorts...from the tutorial:
&sort=inStock asc, price desc
cheers.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:59 PM, kenf_nc wrote:
> Is sort order when 'score' is the same a Lucene thing? Should I ask on the
> Lucene forum?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> ht
Is sort order when 'score' is the same a Lucene thing? Should I ask on the
Lucene forum?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Result-order-when-score-is-the-same-tp2816127p2817330.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10 matches
Mail list logo