Re: Replication hooks - changing the index while the slave is running ...

2007-12-21 Thread Tracy Flynn
he files. So, file data exists until all file names are gone AND all open files are gone. Lance -Original Message- From: Tracy Flynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 7:36 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Replication hooks - changing the index while

RE: Replication hooks - changing the index while the slave is running ...

2007-12-17 Thread Norskog, Lance
day, December 15, 2007 7:36 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Replication hooks - changing the index while the slave is running ... That helps Thanks for the prompt reply On Dec 15, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 7:36 PM, Tracy Flynn > <[EMAI

Re: Replication hooks - changing the index while the slave is running ...

2007-12-15 Thread Tracy Flynn
That helps Thanks for the prompt reply On Dec 15, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Dec 14, 2007 7:36 PM, Tracy Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) The existing index(es) being used by the Solr slave instance are physically deleted 2) The new index snapshots are renamed/moved from the

Re: Replication hooks - changing the index while the slave is running ...

2007-12-15 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Dec 14, 2007 7:36 PM, Tracy Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) The existing index(es) being used by the Solr slave instance are > physically deleted > 2) The new index snapshots are renamed/moved from their temporary > installation location to the default index location > 3) The slave is sent

Re: Replication hooks - changing the index while the slave is running ...

2007-12-14 Thread Tracy Flynn
I've looked at everything suggested - documentation, code and scripts and I follow almost everything that's happening. If I understand correctly, when the updated snapshot is installed on the slave: 1) The existing index(es) being used by the Solr slave instance are physically deleted 2)