Same observations here.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Yonik Seeley
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 1:20:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Redhat vs FreeBSD vs other unix flavors
>
&
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:08 PM, wojtekpia wrote:
> Thanks Otis. Do you know what the most common deployment OS is? I couldn't
> find much on the mailing list or http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers
I would guess RHEL (red hat enterprise linux, or CentOS for the free version).
Ubuntu looks l
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
You should be fine on either Linux or FreeBSD (or any other UNIX
flavour). Running on Solaris would probably give you access to
goodness like dtrace, but you can live without it.
There's dtrace on FreeBSD, too.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ _
I'm willing to be it'd be some flavor of Linux. We run on Gentoo. When
it comes down to it, I'd think your application server (Tomcat, Resin,
etc) would have more impact on Solr performance than the OS.
On that front, I'd bet that Tomcat 5 or 6 is the most commonly deployed.
Thanks for your
Thanks Otis. Do you know what the most common deployment OS is? I couldn't
find much on the mailing list or http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>
>
> You should be fine on either Linux or FreeBSD (or any other UNIX flavour).
> Running on Solaris would probably gi
You should be fine on either Linux or FreeBSD (or any other UNIX flavour).
Running on Solaris would probably give you access to goodness like dtrace, but
you can live without it.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: wojtekpia
