Re: Recent document boosting with dismax

2009-02-03 Thread James Brady
Great, thanks for that, Chris! 2009/2/3 Chris Hostetter > > : Hi, no the data_added field was one per document. > > i would suggest adding multiValued="false" to your "date" fieldType so > that Solr can enforce that for you -- otherwise we can't be 100% sure. > > if it really is only a single va

Re: Recent document boosting with dismax

2009-02-03 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Hi, no the data_added field was one per document. i would suggest adding multiValued="false" to your "date" fieldType so that Solr can enforce that for you -- otherwise we can't be 100% sure. if it really is only a single valued field, then i suspect you're right about the index corruption b

Re: Recent document boosting with dismax

2009-02-02 Thread James Brady
Hi, no the data_added field was one per document. 2009/2/1 Erik Hatcher > Is your date_added field multiValued and you've assigned multiple to some > documents? > >Erik > > > On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:12 PM, James Brady wrote: > > Hi,I'm following the recipe here: >> >> http://wiki.apache.or

Re: Recent document boosting with dismax

2009-02-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
Is your date_added field multiValued and you've assigned multiple to some documents? Erik On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:12 PM, James Brady wrote: Hi,I'm following the recipe here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#head-b1b1cdedcb9cd9bfd9c994709b4d7e540359b1fdfor boosting recent do