Faceting on analyzed text can eat a lot of RAM. This strategy might not scale.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
wrote:
> Good point,
>
> so you could have an unanalyzed counterpart field set with a
> and facet on that..
>
> On 5 October 2010 23:49, Markus Jelsma wrote:
>
Good point,
so you could have an unanalyzed counterpart field set with a
and facet on that..
On 5 October 2010 23:49, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> It is a good practice (for many cases as seen on the list) to search
> (usually with fq) on analzyed fields but return the facet list based on the
> unan
It is a good practice (for many cases as seen on the list) to search (usually
with fq) on analzyed fields but return the facet list based on the unanalyzed
counterparts.
-Original message-
From: Savvas-Andreas Moysidis
Sent: Wed 06-10-2010 00:46
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
Subjec
