Re: Randomly slow response times for range queries

2010-09-08 Thread Erick Erickson
Here's a good place to start with garbage collection: http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/19/java-garbage-collection-boot-camp-draft/ About precision step. Optimal means different things for different indexes. You have to provide a lot more detail about your problem space before anyone ca

Re: Randomly slow response times for range queries

2010-09-08 Thread oleg.gnatovskiy
Also, does anyone know the best precisionStep to use on a trie field (float) definition to achieve optimal performance? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Randomly-slow-response-times-for-range-queries-tp1441724p1443096.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list

Re: Randomly slow response times for range queries

2010-09-08 Thread oleg.gnatovskiy
Well I am only sending about 50 QPS at it at the time that it temporarily slows down, and then it's able to get all the way up to 100 QPS+ with no problems (until the next random queries). I suppose it could be the garbage collection. Is there a good way to limit this? -- View this message in con

Re: Randomly slow response times for range queries

2010-09-08 Thread Erick Erickson
Well, throw enough queries at any server and it'll slow right down, so how many are we talking here? But no, there're no SOLR issues like this that I know of. That said, you could be getting cache thrashing. You could be getting garbage collection by the JVM. You could be executing commits somehow