On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 6:56 AM, abhishes wrote:
>
> Thanks really useful article.
>
> I am wondering about this statement in the article
>
> "Keep in mind that Solr does not calculate universal term/doc frequencies.
> At a large scale, its not likely to matter that tf/idf is calculated at the
>
There is already a patch available to address that short-coming in
distributed search:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632
On Feb 11, 2010, at 6:56 AM, abhishes wrote:
Thanks really useful article.
I am wondering about this statement in the article
"Keep in mind that Solr
Thanks really useful article.
I am wondering about this statement in the article
"Keep in mind that Solr does not calculate universal term/doc frequencies.
At a large scale, its not likely to matter that tf/idf is calculated at the
shard level - however, if your collection is heavily skewed in
Hi,
I think your needs would meet better with Distributed Search http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch
Which allows sharding to live on different servers and will search
across all of those shard when a query comes in. There are a few patch
which will hopefully be available in the S
To scale solr, take a look to this article
http://www.lucidimagination.com/Community/Hear-from-the-Experts/Articles/Scaling-Lucene-and-Solr
Juan Pedro Danculovic
CTO - www.linebee.com
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:12 AM, abhishes wrote:
>
> Suppose I am indexing very large data (5 billion rows
