: There is a Solr.PatternTokenizerFactory class which likely fits the bill in
: this case. The related question I have is this - is it possible to have
: multiple Tokenizers in your analysis chain?
No .. Tokenizers consume CharReaders and produce a TokenStream ... what's
needed here is a TokenF
On 10/6/09 3:32 PM, "Chris Hostetter" wrote:
>
> : I ll try to explain with an example. Given the term 'it!' in the title, it
> : should match both 'it' and 'it!' in the query as an exact match. Currently,
> : this is done by using a synonym entry (and index time SynonymFilter) as
> : follow
: I ll try to explain with an example. Given the term 'it!' in the title, it
: should match both 'it' and 'it!' in the query as an exact match. Currently,
: this is done by using a synonym entry (and index time SynonymFilter) as
: follows:
:
: it! => it, it!
:
: Now, the above holds true for
On 10/5/09 8:59 PM, "Christian Zambrano" wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be better to use built-in token filters at both index and
> query that will convert 'it!' to just 'it'? I believe the
> WorkDelimeterFilterFactory will do that for you.
>
We do have a field that uses WordDelimiterFilter but it a
Prasanna,
Wouldn't it be better to use built-in token filters at both index and
query that will convert 'it!' to just 'it'? I believe the
WorkDelimeterFilterFactory will do that for you.
Christian
On Oct 5, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Prasanna Ranganathan > wrote:
On 10/5/09 2:46 AM, "Shalin S
On 10/5/09 2:46 AM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar" wrote:
>> Alternatively, is there a filter available which takes in a pattern and
>> produces additional forms of the token depending on the pattern? The use
>> case I am looking at here is using such a filter to automate synonym
>> generation. In ou
I just saw the reply from Shalin after sending this email. Kindly excuse.
On 10/5/09 5:17 PM, "Prasanna Ranganathan" wrote:
>
> Can someone please give me some pointers to the questions in my earlier
> email? And and every help is much appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Prasanna.
>
>
> On 10/
Can someone please give me some pointers to the questions in my earlier
email? And and every help is much appreciated.
Regards,
Prasanna.
On 10/2/09 11:01 AM, "Prasanna Ranganathan"
wrote:
>
> Does the PatternReplaceFilter have an option where you can keep the original
> token in addition
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Prasanna Ranganathan <
pranganat...@netflix.com> wrote:
>
> Does the PatternReplaceFilter have an option where you can keep the
> original token in addition to the modified token? From what I looked at it
> does not seem to but I want to confirm the same.
>
>
No,
