On 14-May-07, at 10:05 PM, James liu wrote:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not ignoring it: I'm implying that the above is the correct
descending score-sorted order. You have to perform that sort
manually.
i mean merged results(from 60 p) and sort it, not solr's sort.
ev
maybe full-text search sort correct not very import.
2007/5/15, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 14-May-07, at 8:55 PM, James liu wrote:
>
> > thks for your detail answer.
> >
> > but u ignore "sorted by score"
> >
> > p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 8:55 PM, James liu wrote:
> thks for your detail answer.
>
> but u ignore "sorted by score"
>
> p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
>
> maybe their max score is lower than from p19,p20.
>
I'm not ignoring it: I'm implying that the above is the c
On 14-May-07, at 8:55 PM, James liu wrote:
thks for your detail answer.
but u ignore "sorted by score"
p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
maybe their max score is lower than from p19,p20.
I'm not ignoring it: I'm implying that the above is the correct
descending score-sorted order. You have to pe
for example, i wanna query "lucene", it's numFound is 234300.
and results should sorted by score.
if u do, how to pagination and sort it's score?
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 7:15 PM, James liu wrote:
> if i set rows=(page-1)*10,,,it will lose more result whi
thks for your detail answer.
but u ignore "sorted by score"
p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
maybe their max score is lower than from p19,p20.
so it will not sorted by score correctly.
and if user click page 2 to see, how to show data?
p1 start from 10 or query other partitions?
2007/5/15, Mike Kl
On 14-May-07, at 7:15 PM, James liu wrote:
if i set rows=(page-1)*10,,,it will lose more result which fits query.
how to set start when pagination.
I'm not sure I understand the question.
When combining results from partitions, you can't use startAt. You
must always assemble the docs fro
On 14-May-07, at 6:49 PM, James liu wrote:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
When you get up to 60 partitions, you should make it a multi stage
process. Assuming your partitions are disjoint and evenly
distributed, estimate the number of do
if i set rows=(page-1)*10,,,it will lose more result which fits query.
how to set start when pagination.
2007/5/15, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
>
> > if use multi index box, how to pagination with
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
> if use multi index box, how to pagination with sort by score
> correctly?
>
> for example, i wanna query "search" with 60 index box and sort by
> score.
>
> i don't know the num found from every index box wh
On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
if use multi index box, how to pagination with sort by score
correctly?
for example, i wanna query "search" with 60 index box and sort by
score.
i don't know the num found from every index box which have different
content.
if promise 10 page wit
11 matches
Mail list logo
