20
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> How many items for each query?
>
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Chamnap Chhorn
> wrote:
> > Well, I use Solr 1.4.
> >
> > There are 30698 lines in my elevation file. I need only 20 results
> response
> > back at a time.
> >
> > On S
How many items for each query?
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Chamnap Chhorn wrote:
> Well, I use Solr 1.4.
>
> There are 30698 lines in my elevation file. I need only 20 results response
> back at a time.
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
>
>> Now you got me interested
Well, I use Solr 1.4.
There are 30698 lines in my elevation file. I need only 20 results response
back at a time.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> Now you got me interested. Always a bad thing ;)
>
> Looking at the QueryElevationComponent, I don't know enough to decide
>
Now you got me interested. Always a bad thing ;)
Looking at the QueryElevationComponent, I don't know enough to decide
if it has algorithms that don't scale. It does something odd with
sorting. It has a concurrent access path for each query, which should
not be a problem. It has not changed much s
Thanks for reply.
I'm looking for how to improve the speed of the search query. The
QueryElevation Component is taking too much time which is
unacceptable. The size of elevation file is only 1 Mb. I wonder other
people using this component without problems (related to speed)? Am I
using it the wro
Thanks for reply.
I'm looking for how to improve the speed of the search query. The
QueryElevation Component is taking too much time which is
unacceptable. The size of elevation file is only 1 Mb. I wonder other
people using this component without problems (related to speed)? Am I
using it the wro
I do not know if this is accurate. There are direct tools to monitor
these problems: jconsole, visualgc/visualvm, YourKit, etc. Often these
counts allot many things to one place that should be spread out.
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Chamnap Chhorn
wrote:
> anyone has some suggestions to imp
anyone has some suggestions to improve the search?
thanks
On 10/28/10, Chamnap Chhorn wrote:
> Sorry for very bad pasting. I paste it again.
>
> Slowest Components Count Exclusive
> Total
> QueryElevationComponent 1 5
Sorry for very bad pasting. I paste it again.
Slowest Components Count Exclusive
Total
QueryElevationComponent 1 506,858 ms 100%
506,858 ms 100%
SolrIndexSearcher 1 2.0 ms
0
