The point of filter queries is that they are applied very early in the
searching algorithm, and thus cut the amount of work later on. Some
complex queries take a lot of time and so this pre-trimming helps a
lot.
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:19 P
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
>> 10,000,000 document index
>> Internal Document id is 32 bit unsigned int
>> Max Memory Used by a single cache slot in the filter cache = 32 bits x
>> 10,000,000 docs = 320,000,000 bits or 38 MB
>
> I think it depends on where exactly the resu
> 10,000,000 document index
> Internal Document id is 32 bit unsigned int
> Max Memory Used by a single cache slot in the filter cache = 32 bits x
> 10,000,000 docs = 320,000,000 bits or 38 MB
I think it depends on where exactly the result set was generated. I believe the
result set will usually
Erick -
Thanks for the insight. Does the filter cache just cache the internal
document id's of the result set, correct (as opposed to the document)? If
so, am I correct in the following math:
10,000,000 document index
Internal Document id is 32 bit unsigned int
Max Memory Used by a single cache s
The pitfalls of filter queries is also their strength. The results will be
cached and re-used if possible. This will take some memory,
of course. Depending upon how big your index is, this could
be quite a lot.
Yet another time/space tradeoff But yeah, use filter queries
until you have OOMs, t
On 8/24/2011 6:07 PM, Joshua Harness wrote:
Shawn -
Thanks for your reply. Given that my application is mainly used as
faceted search, would the following types of queries make sense or are there
other pitfalls to consider?
q=*:*&fq=someField:someValue&fq=anotherField:anotherValue
I'm n
Shawn -
Thanks for your reply. Given that my application is mainly used as
faceted search, would the following types of queries make sense or are there
other pitfalls to consider?
*q=*:*&fq=someField:someValue&fq=anotherField:anotherValue*
Thanks!
Josh
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Sha
On 8/24/2011 2:02 PM, Joshua Harness wrote:
I've done some basic query performance testing on my SOLR instance,
which allows users to search via a faceted search interface. As such,
document relevancy is less important to me since I am performing exact match
searching. Comparing using filte
