I think you're assuming that this is Boolean logic. It's not, see:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Rublex wrote:
> Jack,
>
> Thank you the *:* solutions seems to work.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> ht
Jack,
Thank you the *:* solutions seems to work.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-Logic-Question-tp3991689p3991881.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It should work properly with the edismax query parser. The traditional
lucene query parser is not smart enough about the fact that the Lucene
BooleanQuery can't properly handle queries with only negative clauses.
Put *:* in front of all your negative terms and you will get similar
results. edi
I think they are logically the same. but 1 may be a little bit faster than 2
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Rublex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone explain to me please why these two queries return different
> results:
>
> 1. -PaymentType:Finance AND -PaymentType:Lease AND -PaymentType:Cash *(700
>
