Hi!
Thanks for the reply.
We decided to give another try with ngrams. After much tweaking/tuning for
our needs. Both the size and speed was more than good enough for our needs.
So it looks like ngrams was the solution for us afterall :)
Best regards
Tor Henning Ueland
--
View this message in co
Hi,
Perhaps you should give Lucene/Solr trunk a try and compare! The Wildcard
query
in trunk should be much faster.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
> From: Ueland
> To: solr
>Which version of solr are you using ?
Currently testing with 3.1
> NGrams could be an option but could you give us the field definition in
> your schema ? The words count in this field index ?
I wont share the complete schema but i can summarize it:
For testing, we have around 30 fields used t
Which version of solr are you using ?
NGrams could be an option but could you give us the field definition in your
schema ? The words count in this field index ?
Ludovic.
2011/4/10 Ueland [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2802561-121096623-383...@n3.nabble.com>
> Hi!
>
> I have been doing some testing wi
