Yes, the internal document forwarding path is different and does not use the
CloudSolrServer. It currently works with a buffer of 10.
- Mark
On Jul 29, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Why wouldn't it? Or are you saying that the routing to replicas
> from the leader also 10/packet? Hm
Why wouldn't it? Or are you saying that the routing to replicas
from the leader also 10/packet? Hmmm, hadn't thought of that...
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> SOLR-4816 won't address this - it will just speed up *different* parts. There
> are other things that will need to
SOLR-4816 won't address this - it will just speed up *different* parts. There
are other things that will need to be done to speed up that part.
- Mark
On Jul 26, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> This is current a hard-coded limit from what I've understood. From what
> I remember, Mark
This is current a hard-coded limit from what I've understood. From what
I remember, Mark said Yonik said that there are reasons to make the
packets that size. But whether this is empirically a Good Thing I don't know.
SOLR-4816 will address this a different way by making SolrJ batch up
the docs an
