The term histograms are shared in this link. Sorry for the confusion.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tma4hkYjxJfBTnMbO6Pq_dUHqZ0wI_UTlgoVqXtW4ZA/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000&slide=id.p
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lei,
>>
>> The mailing li
Sure, here is the link to the image of term histograms. Thanks.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tma4hkYjxJfBTnMbO6Pq_dUHqZ0wI_UTlgoVqXtW4ZA/edit?usp=sharing
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> Hi Lei,
>
> The mailing list doesn't allow attachments. Can you share these
Hi Lei,
The mailing list doesn't allow attachments. Can you share these via a file
sharing platform?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:48 AM, lei wrote:
> The Solr instance is single-shard. Index size is around 20G and total doc
> # is about 12 million. Below are the histograms for the three facet fiel
The Solr instance is single-shard. Index size is around 20G and total doc #
is about 12 million. Below are the histograms for the three facet fields in
my query. Thanks.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 21:14 +0100, lei wrote:
>
> You present a very
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 21:14 +0100, lei wrote:
You present a very interesting observation. I have not noticed what you
describe, but on the other hand we have not done comparative speed
tests.
> q=*:*&fq=country:"US"&fq=category:112
First observation: Your query is '*:*, which is a "magic" query.
on this. I thought maybe I was the only one...
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: lei [mailto:simpl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 2:40 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance on faceting using docValues
Here is the specs of some example query facetin
Some mistake in the previous email.
Here is the specs of some example query faceting on three fields (all
string type):
first call: 1+ sec (with docValues) vs. 4+ sec (w/o docValues)
subsequent calls: 100+ ms (with docValues) vs. 30+ ms (w/o docValues)
consistently
the total # of docs returned is
Hello,
I have one consideration on top of my head, would you mind to show a brief
snapshot by a sampler?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:18 PM, lei wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm testing facet performance with vs without docValues in Solr 4.7, and
> found that on first request, performance with docValues
Here is the specs of some example query faceting on three fields (all
string type):
first call: 1+ sec (with docValues) vs. 4+ sec (w/o docValues)
subsequent calls: 30+ ms (with docValues) vs. 100+ ms (w/o docValues)
consistently
the total # of docs returned is around 600,000
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015
